Friday, May 01, 2009

Evaluation of Disaster Governance in Indonesia 2004-2006

Old paper on Evaluation of Disaster Governance in Indonesia 2004-2006. The content is in Bahasa. Please download the file from here. Download

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Linking Risk Reduction and Poverty Reduction

I am happy to share two recognition of works of my folks in West Timor in the ISDR Publication in 2007 and 2008.

Clean water as an entry point to risk reduction and poverty alleviation - By Community Association for Disaster Management (PMPB) Kupang. In UNISDR 2008 "Linking Disaster Risk Reduction and Poverty Reduction Good Practices and Lessons Learned A Publication of the Global Network of NGOs for Disaster Risk Reduction." Page 28-32. Download

Also See PMPB Kupang work on "Combining Science and Indigenous Knowledge to Build a Community Early Warning System." By PMPB Kupang- Community Association for Disaster Management (In partnership with Yayasan Pikul). In Building Disaster Resilient Communities Good Practices and Lessons Learned A Publication of the “Global Network of NGOs” for Disaster Risk Reduction. In Page 26-28. Download

Lihat dan download PERDA Bencana NTT Download
Lihat dan download Pergub Bencana NTT download
Lihat dan download Perda DAS NTT download

Monday, March 02, 2009

No more fish in the sea

Is it a disaster?

No more fish in the sea Mar 2nd 2009 From Economist.com

The global fish catch is levelling off

WORLD fish production hit 143.6m tonnes in 2006, the highest since records began in 1950, according to a new biannual report from the UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation. Just over 110m tonnes was eaten by people, with the rest used as animal feed or for other commercial uses. Some 47% of fish on dinner plates is now farmed, and this is likely to increase as the amount caught in the wild levels off. The catch in 2006 from marine and inland waters fell to 92m tonnes from 94.2m the previous year. China is the world's biggest producer in both categories, landing 17.1m tonnes of fish from its waters, and farming 34.4m tonnes.

See more Economist.com

Saturday, February 28, 2009

The DNA Code of Risk

Please download the full paper (final version March 2009) entitled "The DNA Code of Risk Has TWO Intertwined Strands: Why Vulnerability Matters. A Civil Society Response to the Draft Guidelines for Disaster Risk Assessment in Indonesia."

Download Full Paper: The DNA Code of Risk

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Feeling better, doing worse?

By Jonatan Lassa, Bonn, Thu, 02/26/2009 Opinion, the Jakarta Post.

There is an increasing trend of social economic losses in "natural" disasters due to the rising number of natural hazard incidents together with the increasingly vulnerable population in Indonesia.

The United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) jointly with Leuven Catholic University's Center for Research on Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) reported recently that 2008 showed an increase in the number of deaths and economic losses compared to the 2000-2007 yearly average.

The recent 7.2-magnitude earthquake (S.R.) in the Talaud Islands regency in North Sulawesi, that caused hundreds of injuries and damage to 500 buildings according to the national media, show one important lesson. The people not only live in a vulnerable environment in regard to housing and infrastructure but also lack the infrastructure to react quickly to the warning of a potential tsunami.

We witness floods in many pro-vinces in Indonesia today, which cause losses and damage to livelihood, life and infrastructure, coming together with "the unpleasant guests" such as dengue, malaria and diarrhea (see The Jakarta Post , Feb. 14). Hence, one may be wrong asserting that Indonesia is not moving forward to reduce disaster risks amid the increasing trend of disaster risks.

On the other hand, one may share the optimistic view, asserting that Indonesia is getting better, or far better, at disaster risk management today than in the past. In terms of laws and regulations concerning disaster risks, under the auspices of the National Disaster Management Law 24/2007, followed by various ancillary regulations such as the set up of the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB) through Presidential Regulation 8/2008 and the government regulation for Disaster Management Implementation 21/2008, Indonesia has gained new momentum for a better risk management policy.

But why do many people feel worse when the government is doing better in anticipating natural disasters? This question was once asked by Aaron Wildavsky in 1977 within the United States' context in his famous paper Doing Better and Feeling Worse: The Political Patho-logy of Health Policy, published by MIT Press. It later became known as the Wildavsky paradox.

But in the Indonesian context today, the paradox can actually be reversed "why are we feeling better while actually we are not doing enough?"

For more: click here "Feeling better doing worse."

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Cost and Benefit Analysis for Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia

A Contribution to IDEA Jogja’s Research on Participatory Cost and Benefit Analysis for Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesian Districts: Towards Participatory DRR Budgeting.
The IDEA report is forthcoming in 2009

Please download from HERE

The Disaster of Jokes and the Jokes of Disaster

Disaster of Jokes and Joke of Disaster: Towards Fuller Understanding of the Risk context!

Please download from: Here

Friday, January 23, 2009

Our starving children

Published in The Jakarta Post

Business and Investment - January 23, 2009

Jonatan Lassa, Bonn

Just recently, this newspaper reported 11 children died of acute malnutrition in Kupang, West Timor within just three weeks. Four of them were from an ex-East Timor refugee camp in Kupang district (The Jakarta Post, Jan. 15).

The story of the mortality of the 11 children was "fortunate" in being seized upon by the media both at the national and the provincial level. But this could be just the tip of the iceberg, because, while the rest of the toll is too unfortunate to experience the spotlight, "a silent emergency" is spreading throughout the nation.

Again, this newspaper, reported that the 11 children were not alone. That there were more than 600 recorded infant deaths during 2007-2008 in Banyumas, Central Java, alone (The Jakarta Post, Jan. 9).

Let us make a short detour to ascertain the definition of malnutrition. Early understanding of malnutrition, for example by Taliaferro Clark, is "a condition of undernourishment or being underweight. It is seen in boys and girls at any period after infancy or in childhood". (Cited in Public Health Reports, Vol. 36 No.17, April 29, 1921).

Today, as the Encyclopedia of International Development suggests, malnutrition is "an anomalous physiological condition characterized by continuous imbalances in energy, protein, and micronutrients intake and/or absorption. "

The definition changed simply because in the North, malnutrition can manifest as overweight and obesity. While in the developing countries like Indonesia, especially in rural and sub-urban setting, Clark's definition holds in the vast majority of malnutrition cases.

The question is where the responsibility lies? Who is to blame? Can those responsible take on the critics and achieve zero cases of malnutrition in Indonesia? Or is poverty once again to be blamed?

Since poverty seems to be impersonal, high-ranking officials and the ruling government may only be nodding, confirming poverty as the root cause, as the Institute of Ecosoc Rights, a Jakarta-based NGO, once blamed poverty in their research on famine in East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) province in 2006.

However, as the title of this article suggests, malnutrition is actually a manifestation of poor development. Surely only irresponsible government can be unperturbed amid the death of their future generation.

In an informal discussion within the NTT Academia Forum (a group of academics from East Nusa Tenggara province), a colleague of mine strongly stressed that "we cannot be silent" on the subject of malnutrition. The problem is, malnutrition is still seen as an event, a killing agent, isolated, separated from the process of development policy and practice, not seen as the product of development, or in better terms, the daily accumulation of poor development practices.

Serious question should be asked. Why doesn't Jakarta respond to the issue of malnutrition in the same way it responds to a war situated 6,000 km away in the Middle East, assuming that the value of human life is the main concern?

Some may suspect that the issue is silenced because "the new Indonesians" (i.e. ex-refugees from Timor Leste in West Timor) are not pure Indonesian. If this should be the attitude of the elite then, in short, may I say, we are worse than the Dutch colonial government, who granted assets such as land in the Belu district to the influx of Timor Leste refugees in 1911, when forced labor was imposed by Portuguese regime in Dili.

However, this suspicion may be incorrect as malnutrition also happens in Java and elsewhere in Indonesia. Since the actual number of malnutrition cases is never known, unless assumptions are being made in order to fit in with the "methodologically correct" principles. Activists seem to favor the iceberg analogy to argue that this silent disaster could probably have far more victims than those who have died in Palestine. This is not to downplay our international diplomacy in the Middle East on the rights of innocent civilians.

However, this issue begs an equal level of attention, a call for long-term concern over the basic nutritional and food needs of the innocent children of the Republic of Indonesia, right here at home. It is argued that if development is about "the production of social change that creates conditions where more and more people can achieve their human potential, "then malnutrition is the product of "mal-development".

Thus "mal-development" or poor development practices can be seen as the failure of the state to develop, to progress towards human freedom, including the freedom of the innocent children - the future generation of the Republic.

The officials and policy makers may reduce the cases of malnutrition to a social-cultural problem alone and not have the courage to see the case as a systemic failure of the development programs.

Often, the legal and formal products are out there to tackle the malnutrition problem.

However, the persistent volatility of commitment from the elite means that the issue remains a long-standing problem.This may explain why "mal-development" takes places and thus malnutrition persists.

The writer is a Ph.D candidate at the University of Bonn, Research on Disaster Risk Governance and a member of Forum NTT Academia (www.ntt-academia.org)